Am I mistaken to think that governing by proclamation is similar to totalitarianism, especially if it seems to be a habitual way of getting things done? When such a form of “ruling” becomes the accepted norm (with no consequences) can dictatorship be far away?
Okay, I get it, a bunch of Americans don’t like Obama. You have made your point clear. A bunch of Americans didn’t like Bush either. In both cases, the muck-throwing has been prodigious! Shame on us! How fortunate we are to be citizens of a country where they don’t lock you up or knock you off for criticizing the president/prime minister/king or dictator. If we lived in one of these nations, a bunch of people would now be behind bars or deceased.
How privileged we are to be able to vote for the president and congress (the Supreme Court is another matter). Come the next election, we can vote-out those we disagree with and vote-in those we think better represent our values. Historically this is a new paradigm bestowed upon the world by the Mother of Parliaments and not every nation is ready or able to live within this concept. Yes, we are indeed fortunate to live in a nation governed by and for the people.
In a couple of years, we will be able to express our opinions of Mr. Obama and his party by voting in an election. We can go to the polls and fire those we disagree with. In the meantime we can make our opinions known in letters to the editor, blogs and in the various forms of social media.
Unfortunately, what I have been reading across the political spectrum is distressing. Never have I seen such hatred and invective. So much of it is offensive, disrespectful, divisive and downright ungodly. Some of it is simply false. And, to make matters worse, too much of it comes from people who call themselves Christians.
It is possible to disagree without spewing hatred. The lengths to which some go to express their hatred is astonishing…especially from those who should be known for speaking the truth in love…whether that truth is related to the gospel or any other subject.
How would you like to live under a Roman emperor or a cruel king or governor? Well, as a matter of history, Christ and his followers lived in such a time. And yet, we fail to see them respond with anything but Godliness. About the strongest language I can recall is when Jesus called Herod a “fox” (Luke 13:32) I challenge you who claim to be Christians to re-read some pertinent passages.
- · Pilate’s authority (when he reminded Jesus that he had authority to crucify him) was given to him by God.
- · All authority is from God and we are to be subject to them. We are not to resist their authority…to do so is to oppose the ordinance of God.
- · Authority is a minister of God to you for good.
- · It is necessary to be in subjection for conscience’ sake.
- · We are to render tax, custom, respect and honor to whom it is due.
1 Timothy 2:1-4
- · We are to pray for kings and all who are in authority.
- · We are to pray for them that we may lead a tranquil and quiet life in all godliness and dignity.
- · This is good and acceptable in the sight of God.
1 Peter 2:13,14
· “Submit yourselves for the Lord’s sake to every human institution, whether to a king as the one in authority, 14 or to governors as sent by him for the punishment of evildoers and the praise of those who do right.“
1 Peter 2:17
· “Honor all people, love the brotherhood, fear God, honor the king.”
We live in a wonderful time when we can voice our opposition and act upon it in word and deed when we go to the polls. But we must do it with honor and respect, praying for those in authority whether we agree or disagree with their policies. It is high time we begin acting like the one we follow.
I believe that one of the most beneficial changes any church could make is to correct their misunderstanding of evangelism. We’ve made such a monster of it in our minds that very few of us do any of it at all. We count on having user-friendly churches with seeker-sensitive assemblies featuring a great preacher, state-of-the-art equipment and methods. We rely on doing Bible classes and assemblies so well that when people visit us to do their church shopping, we hope they’ll choose us instead of that other church down the road. There are three things wrong with that.
· First, it’s not evangelism it’s accumulation.
· Secondly, people who have to be won by attractive methods and surface cosmetics will only last as long as those remain valid.
· Third, it is a focus and emphasis unknown by Jesus, the apostles and the early church.
The church that won the Roman Empire knew nothing of “user-friendly” or “seeker-sensitive churches or spectacular methods of reaching the unconverted. Mark Galli writes,
What it did have seems paltry: unspectacular people, with a hodgepodge of methods (so hodgepodge they can hardly be called “methods”), and rarely a gathering of more than a handful of people. The paltry seems to have been enough, however, to make an emperor or two stop and take notice (Christian History, Issue 57, p. 8).
Without publicized campaigns or even an explicit evangelistic strategy, Christianity made its way quietly and effectively in an environment not wholly unlike that in the post-Christian West today.
Glenn Hinson writes, “Most churches had the same goal: evangelism.” But it was not evangelism based on getting people into church buildings since it was nearly 300 years before the first one was built. This was evangelism by friendship. It was outreach through good works such as feeding the hungry and rescuing abandoned children (1 Peter 2:12). It was the message of a moral and pure way of life (1 Peter 3:2). It was seen in their keen pursuit of justice. Each disciple was ready to tell their friends and associates the reason for their hope (1 Peter 3:15).
Evangelism is the life-blood of any congregation of the church. Only if it becomes our goal, we will truly become alive.
The Case for Rejecting Instruments in the Assembly
Churches of Christ (the a cappella segment) seem to be becoming very different very quickly. Several larger congregations and a number of smaller ones (I have no idea of the actual numbers) have opted for adding mechanical (as opposed to vocal) instruments to their assemblies (I absolutely refuse to call them “worship services” as that description of assemblies of the saints is nowhere to be found in Scripture – and, when you think about it, it betrays an ignorance of the meanings of both “worship” and “service”). For over a century, one of the distinguishing marks of churches of Christ was strong opposition to the use of instruments in assemblies. Countless debates, articles and divisions occurred with both sides remaining unconvinced.
It will not be my purpose here to pile more verbiage on the tons of arguments by taking one side or the other. I’m not sure it would serve any purpose except to put me in one opposing camp or another. No, my point will be something different. I want us to take an honest look at our motives. WHY are we ditching our a cappella tradition?
The most common reason given is some variation on the desire to attract a younger, hipper crowd into our buildings. One group is currently remodeling their auditorium to add a stage for the musicians. If we build it, they reason, they will come. Sound familiar? Put simply, it is an attempt to increase attendance at their “worship services.”
At this point let me ask a question that seldom seems asked: what are assemblies for? No…not what do you WANT them for but what are they REALLY for? By that I mean what does Scripture say they are for?
· Are they for “seekers?” Can you show me a passage for that?
· Are they for the entertainment of the members? Passage?
· Are they for the excitement of the members? Passage?
· Are they for the encouragement of the members? Bingo!
· Are they for the edification of the members? Score!
Our purpose for assemblies and our conduct during them seems to be the focus of Paul’s first letter to the Corinthians in chapters eleven and fourteen. He deals with several subjects but his emphasis; especially in chapter fourteen is edification. Edification has absolutely nothing to do with attracting a crowd and blowing them away with sanctified rock (make no mistake, I like to rock as much as anyone). To edify is to instruct and improve especially in moral and religious knowledge…promoting the spiritual growth and development of character of believers, by teaching or by example. Look it up. Paul goes so far as to say, “…let all things be done for edification” (I Corinthians 14:26).
So. How do we instruct and promote each other’s spiritual growth? One of the most important and effective ways is by singing to one another (Ephesians 5:19 and Colossians 3:16). Notice that our singing is for teaching and admonishing one another. Sorry folks, well-choreographed and orchestrated performances accomplish nothing assembly is designed for. In truth, they hinder the process. Inevitably, the volume gets louder and louder. How can we edify one another if we can’t hear the singing of the one standing next to us? Read lips? Not likely!
Could this be the reason we are commanded to sing to one another? Singing with thankfulness is not assisted by a groovy drummer, hot guitarist, deft keyboardist and a soloist who’s been listening to a lot of contemporary Christian radio. Save all that for a concert.
Are there exceptions? Of course. Some of the new contemporary music conveys wonderful spiritual, edifying truths. Even a cappella churches have adapted and incorporated some of these songs in our assemblies. In my experience, however, the mechanical instruments overwhelm the potential edification as they play louder and louder.
Here is the crux of the problem as I see it: we have turned our assemblies into something they were never intended to be. They are times of encouragement and edification. When this is not accomplished, our assemblies are failures no matter how well choreographed they are. When we leave behind principles and purposes taught by Scripture; when we replace them with innovations never envisioned by the Spirit; when edification and encouragement are no longer the focus of our assemblies; when synthetic externals take precedence over spiritual internals — we can expect to fail. In the words of Hosea (8:7), we have sown the wind and are now reaping the whirlwind.
Here are a couple of articles that, while I don’t agree with everything they say, help make my point: http://churchformen.com/uncategorized/have-christians-stopped-singing/ http://www.patheos.com/blogs/afewgrownmen/2013/05/why-men-have-stopped-singing-in-church/
I have finally come to grips that I will not be a “mover and a shaker.” The world, alas, is not clamoring for my opinions, my advice, my counsel, my pontifications. The President and members of congress no longer call (man, could I give them an earful if they did!). It has been some time since some anchor person contacted me to get my take on foreign or domestic events and developments. Celebrities fail to call me for my thoughts on the directions their careers should take. No one sends me scripts for potential movies or plays anymore. Congress persists in passing bills without my input.
So what can I do to make the world a better place? Jesus said we can do this by serving; by letting our light shine through our good works (Matthew 5:13,14). Consider:
Think of your fellow man
lend him a helping hand
put a little love in your heart.
You see it’s getting late
oh please don’t hesitate
put a little love in your heart.
And the world will be a better place
and the world will be a better place
for you and me
you just wait and see.
Generally, I love the comedy of Jeff Foxworthy. This time I am both laughing and crying. I was a preacher for a long time and I know the pressures of the profession. When the congregation is not growing/happy/interested/involved/etc., the preacher is the first one blamed and, very often, sent packing. Maybe a new preacher will be more dynamic/younger/pretty/gregarious/educated/entertaining/etc. Sorry, Jeff, that’s not really his job.
Most of this pressure is because we have become assembly-oriented. “Going to church” is the expected and almost exclusive activity of the majority. Because of this, it had better be well-orchestrated (maybe even have an orchestra). If “going to church” is not interesting/exciting/ entertaining, then attendees will drift to a more appealing (I almost wrote, “appalling”) venue. Consequently, all kinds of shenanigans are pulled to draw the crowds away from one congregation to another.
It never seems to cross our minds that our purpose is not to have the biggest congregation, but simply to follow Christ with the strength and wisdom that God provides. It doesn’t seem to occur to us that assemblies are for edification and encouragement. If we restore assemblies to their scriptural purpose, we won’t need smoke bombs, rock bands and a new preacher to keep folks coming back.
The light that we are commissioned to bring to all the world has nothing to do with electricity. It has everything to do with letting the light of Jesus shine through our words, actions and attitudes, bringing glory to God.
Nowhere in the instructions of Jesus and the apostles is there even a hint of having preacher as a position, much less heaping upon him primary responsibility for the state of the congregation and the quality of the “worship service” (a term not found in Scripture).
With church affiliation declining across the denominational spectrum, it is high time to take a fresh look at Scripture. Are we truly following Christ into the world or leaving him in the uncomfortable streets while we attend another comfortable “worship service” in our well-appointed “church buildings?”
May God forgive me (us) for participating so long in something so foreign to Scripture and deviant to our purpose.
I received another note today (on an unnamed social medium) about another building expansion being completed. It celebrated funds raised to add more brick and mortar to an existing building. Oh Hurrah!
We act sometimes like the Great Commission said, “Go into all the world and build buildings to worship in.” What He really said was to make disciples. Furthermore, even though Jesus had nothing to say about “worship services,” we can worship anywhere…in a park, under a tree, in a rented hall, in a house…anywhere.
I can’t, for the life of me, see the connection between building or expanding buildings and seeking and saving the lost. May God forgive us for putting untold billions into buildings constructed in the middle of neighborhoods we have no plans for reaching with the saving gospel.